ABSTRACT
This study examined the risk connectedness and its asymmetry between oil, gold, and foreign exchange under the realized volatility, spillover index framework, and high-frequency data during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was found that: (1) At the beginning of the pandemic outbreak, the total volatility spillover in the system declined, which may indicate that the pandemic cuts the trading activities in the financial markets by inhibiting personnel mobility, then, the spillover experienced a short-term sharp rise due to panic. (2) The exchange rate had a significant risk connectedness with gold and international crude oil, but a restrict connectedness with domestic crude oil after the outbreak. These variations of risk transmission caused by the pandemic emerged later than the outbreak, reflecting a certain lag. (3) The impact of the pandemic on the asymmetric risk connectedness between oil, gold and the exchange rate was limited, and the risk transfer resulting from bad news was dominant during the sample period; however, gold was less affected by bad news than the oil and exchange rates. These findings suggested that the establishment of Chinese crude oil futures could restrain volatility spillovers from the exchange rate; the foreign exchange reserve structure should be optimized. Gold has been proved to have a hedging function with the crude oil, and its proportion in foreign exchange reserves should be appropriately increased.
ABSTRACT
In this study, we analyze the upside and downside risk connectedness among international stock markets. We characterize the connectedness among international stock returns using the Diebold and Yilmaz spillover index approach and compute the upside and downside value-at-risk. We document that the connectedness level of the downside risk is higher than that of the upside risk and stock markets are more sensitive when the stock market declines. We also find that specific periods (e.g., the global financial crisis, the European debt crisis, and the COVID-19 turmoil) intensified the spillover effects across international stock markets. Our results demonstrate that DE, UK, EU, and US acted as net transmitters of dynamic connectedness;however, Japan, China, India, and Hong Kong acted as net receivers of dynamic connectedness during the sample period. These findings provide significant new information to policymakers and market participants.
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates the higher-order moment risk connectedness between West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil futures, Brent oil futures, Chinese oil futures and commodity futures (agricultural, industrial metals, and precious metals) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and following the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, by combining ex-post moment measures and the novel time-varying parameter (TVP)-vector auto-regression (VAR)-based connectedness approach. Further, this paper depicts the dynamic overall and pairwise correlations between oil and commodity futures and constructs the hedging and optimal-weighted portfolio strategies using the DCC-GARCH t-Copula model. This paper also constructs the multivariate oil-commodity portfolio based on the newly proposed minimum connectedness portfolio approach and takes into account the higher-order moment risk connectedness. The empirical results demonstrate that the dynamic linkages between international oil and commodity futures are positive, time-varying, and have been greatly intensified by the outbreak of the 2018 China-US trade war, the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, and the 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict. The risk connectedness results are moment-dependent. The averaged total skewness and kurtosis spillovers are lower than the return and volatility connectedness. Brent (WTI) oil is the largest net transmitter of the return and volatility (skewness and kurtosis) risk spillovers. The dynamic total, net, and net-pairwise spillovers are all time-varying and highly reactive to major crises, especially the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Furthermore, the optimal-weighted portfolio shows a higher risk reduction than the hedging strategy. Finally, the minimum skewness connectedness portfolio shows relatively higher hedging effectiveness, while the minimum kurtosis connectedness portfolio offers the highest cumulative returns.
ABSTRACT
The increasing concerns of investors toward green bonds and their appealing nature of diversification has motivated the current research to study the risk connectedness between green and conventional assets spanning from August 2014 to December 2020. We first estimate the dynamic equi-correlations through DECO-GARCH. Next, we assess the dynamic and static risk connectedness in the median, extreme low, and extreme high quantiles arguing that spillovers vary across different time periods particularly during economically intense time periods. Finally, we analyzed the hedge ratio and hedge effectiveness between green bonds and other assets. We find that equi-correlations are intense during economic shocks such as the Shale oil crisis, Brexit, US interest rate hike, and COVID-19 pandemic. The volatility analysis at average, lower, and upper quantiles also validate time-varying attributes of green and conventional assets. Further, network figures of green and conventional assets identify potential diversification opportunities. Meanwhile, the hedge effectiveness indicates that green bonds are effective hedge for precious metals and cryptocurrencies. Our findings draw multiple implications for policymakers, green investors, financial market participants, and regulatory authorities regarding flight-to-safety during crisis times and maintaining a diverse portfolio to escape potential losses.